ETL vs ELT

What are the key differences and benefits? This guide provides definitions and practical advice to help you understand the differences as you evaluate ETL vs ELT for your organization.

A diagram comparing ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) and ELT (Extract, Load, Transform) processes with icons representing each stage.

ETL vs ELT Overview

The ETL and ELT acronyms both describe processes of cleaning, enriching, and transforming data from a variety of sources before integrating it for use in data analytics, business intelligence and data science.

ETL vs ELT Comparison

The letters stand for Extract, Transform, and Load

  • Extract refers to the process of pulling data from a source such as an SQL or NoSQL database, an XML file or a cloud platform.

  • Transform refers to the process of converting the format or structure of a data set to match that of a target system.

  • Load refers to the process of placing a data set into a target system.

The difference between ETL and ELT is when data transformation happens.
Here is a side-by-side comparison of the two processes:

ETL stands for Extract > Transform > Load
In the ETL process, data transformation is performed in a staging area outside of the data warehouse and the entire data must be transformed before loading. As a result, transforming larger data sets can take a long time up front but analysis can take place immediately once the ETL process is complete.

Illustration showing the 3 steps of the ETL process which are extract, transform and load.

ELT stands for Extract > Load > Transform
In the ELT process, data transformation is performed on an as-needed basis in the target system itself. As a result, the transformation step takes little time but can slow down the querying and analysis processes if there is not sufficient processing power in the cloud solution.

Illustration showing the 3 steps of the ELT process which are extract, load and transform.

There is a place for each process.
The ETL process is appropriate for small data sets which require complex transformations. The ELT process is more appropriate for larger data sets and when timeliness is important.

A dark teal background with abstract curved lines and dots in white and green forming a network-like pattern.

ETL or ELT?

Times are changing. Download the eBook to learn how to choose the right approach for your business, what ELT delivers that ETL can’t, and how to build a real-time data pipeline with ELT.

What is ETL?

ETL is an acronym for “Extract, Transform, and Load” and describes the three stages of the traditional data pipeline. The ETL process is appropriate for small data sets which require complex transformations.

ETL Process

  1. A predetermined subset of data is extracted from the source.

  2. Data is transformed in a staging area in some way such as data mapping, applying concatenations or calculations. Transforming the data before it is loaded is necessary to deal with the constraints of traditional data warehouses.

  3. Data is loaded into the target data warehouse system and is ready to be analyzed by BI or data analytics tools.

Illustration showing the 3 typical steps of a data pipeline which are extract, transform and load.

Key benefits of ETL

  • Data analysis on a single, pre-defined use case can be more stable and faster with the ETL process given that the data set has already been structured and transformed.

  • Compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA standards is easier with ETL given that users can omit any sensitive data prior to loading in the target system.

Learn More About the ETL Process

eBook cover featuring data integration challenges & solutions.

Data Integration Challenges & Solutions

Learn how to overcome the top 14 challenges you face.

What is ELT?

ELT is an acronym for “Extract, Load, and Transform” and describes the three stages of the modern data pipeline. The ELT process is more cost effective then ETL, is appropriate for larger data sets and when timeliness is important.

ELT Process

  1. All data is extracted from the source.

  2. All data is immediately loaded into the target system (either a data warehousedata mart, or data lake). This can include raw, semi-structured and structured data types.

  3. Data is transformed in the target system and is ready to be analyzed by BI tools or data analytics tools

Typically, the target system for ELT is a cloud-based data lake, data mart, data warehouse or data lakehouse. These cloud-based platforms such as Amazon Redshift, Snowflake, Azure Synapse, Databricks and Amazon EMR offer near-unlimited storage and extensive processing power. This allows users to extract and load any and all data they may need in near real time. The cloud platforms transform the data for any BI, analytics, or predictive modeling use case at any time.

Illustration showing the 3 steps of an ELT data pipeline which are extract, load, and transform.

Key benefits of ELT

  • Real-time, flexible data analysis. Users have the flexibility to explore the complete data set, including real-time data, in any direction, without having to wait for IT to extract, transform and load more data.

  • Lower cost and lower maintenance. ELT benefits from a robust ecosystem of cloud-based platforms which offer much lower costs and a variety of plan options to store and process data. And, the ELT process typically requires low maintenance given that all data is always available and the transformation process is usually automated and cloud-based.

Learn More About the ELT Process

A comparison table on a blue background evaluates features of Amazon Redshift, Microsoft Azure Synapse, Google BigQuery, and Snowflake Cloud Data Platform across different categories.

Comparison Guide: Top Cloud Data Warehouses

Modern cloud architectures combine three essentials: the power of data warehousing, flexibility of Big Data platforms, and elasticity of cloud at a fraction of the cost to traditional solution users. But which solution is the right one for you and your business? Download the eBook to see a side-by-side comparison of these leading vendors: Amazon vs. Azure vs. Google vs. Snowflake.

ETL vs ELT Comparison Matrix

Many organizations use both the ETL and ELT processes to cover the spectrum of their data pipeline needs. Let’s take a side-by-side look at the pros and cons of ETL vs ELT, and how they can work in tandem to provide a holistic data integration solution for your business.

ETL vs ELT — 10 Key Differences:

ETL

ELT

1. Support for Data Warehouse

Yes, ETL is the traditional process for transforming and integrating structured or relational data into a cloud-based or on-premises data warehouse.

Yes, ELT is the modern process for transforming and integrating structured or unstructured data into a cloud-based data warehouse.

2. Support for Cloud Data Lake/Mart/Lakehouse

No, ETL is not an appropriate process for cloud data lakes, data marts or data lakehouses.

Yes, the ELT process is tailored to provide a data pipeline for cloud data lakes, data marts or data lakehouses.

3. Size/type of data set

ETL is most appropriate for processing smaller data sets which require complex transformations and have been predetermined as being relevant to the analysis goals.

ELT can handle any size or type of data and is well suited for processing both structured and semi-structured  data. Since the entire data set is loaded, analysts can choose at any time which data to transform and use for analysis.

4. Implementation

The ETL process has been around for decades and there is a mature ecosystem of ETL tools and experts readily available to help with implementation.

The ELT process is a newer approach and the ecosystem of tools and experts needed to implement it is still growing.

5. Transformation

In the ETL process, data transformation is performed in a staging area outside of the data warehouse and the entire data must be transformed before loading. As a result, transforming larger data sets can take a long time up front but analysis can take place immediately once the ETL process is complete.

In the ELT process, data transformation is performed on an as-needed basis in the target system itself. As a result, the transformation step takes little time but can slow down the querying and analysis processes if there is not sufficient processing power.

6. Loading

The ETL loading step requires data to be loaded into a staging area before being loaded into the target system. This multi-step process takes longer than the ELT process.

In ELT, the full data set is loaded directly into the target system. Since there is only one step, and it only happens one time, loading in the ELT process is faster than ETL.

7. Maintenance/Ease of Use

ETL processes that involve an on-premise server require frequent maintenance by IT given their fixed tables, fixed timelines and the requirement to repeatedly select data to load and transform. Newer automated, cloud-based ETL solutions require little maintenance.

The ELT process typically requires low maintenance given that all data is always available and the transformation process is usually automated and cloud-based.

8. Cost

ETL can be cost-prohibitive for many small and medium businesses.

ELT benefits from a robust ecosystem of cloud-based platforms which offer much lower costs and a variety of plan options to store and process data.

9. Hardware

The traditional, on-premises ETL process requires expensive hardware. Newer, cloud-based ETL solutions do not require hardware.

Given that the ELT process is inherently cloud-based, no additional hardware is required.

10. Compliance

ETL is better suited for compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA standards given that users can omit any sensitive data prior to loading in the target system.

ELT carries more risk of exposing private data and not complying with GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA standards given that all data is loaded into the target system.

Learn more about data integration with Qlik